Saturday 5 October 2013

Do Not Fly with American Airlines

Dear readers,

I do not plan to use this blog, in general, for any other purpose but to describe my travels, but I want to dissuade all of you from flying with American Airlines. I was scheduled to fly from New Orleans to Bentonville today via the Dallas-Fort Worth airport, but, due to my first flight's having been delayed by an hour-and-a-half, I missed the last connection of the night to Bentonville (as did three other people; many other people must have missed connecting flights due to bad weather, as there is a whole army of them here). American Airlines is munificent enough not to offer accommodation to people who have missed flights through no fault of their own; not only that, they do not offer breakfast or dinner waivers or any shuttle services to nearby hotels for which one could choose to pay. If you miss a connecting flight at the Dallas-Fort Worth airport due to an earlier flight's being late, you are going to spend the night on a seat in one of the terminals, eating whatever it is that you happen to have with you. I urge you all never to fly with American Airlines and never to plan connecting flights in Dallas-Fort Worth on a Saturday, as they have severely-reduced services on Saturdays. I know that this particular message will not reach very many people, but I am going to spread it as far as I can in order to try to lower American Airlines' revenue. It is, admittedly, a lofty and unrealistic goal, but so was the American Civil Rights Movement. I have seen dozens of people stranded here tonight, and that is only in one of the five terminals of this execrable airport.

Friday 2 August 2013

Days 54-60: The Netherlands

Hello, readers!

I am in an unfortunate spot. I am not too keen to write this email, as I am back in Vancouver and am, thus, returning to daily life. I did not bring my camera or the plug for my computer's charger to the library, where I am currently located. I am hungry. I am hebetudinous. I had some other complaints that have slipped my mind but would have reinforced the impression that I do not want to write this email. [Edit: I remembered one of my gripes. I could easily enough have continued to write daily emails if only I had asked my hosts for their wireless password; I did not have the perspicacity to even ask if they had wireless internet. As it turned out, I was free to write each evening, and I instead spent my time reading. Such is life.]

My blog would be incomplete without a final email capping it off, though, and my trip to Holland was sufficiently magical to warrant detailed description. I should start by saying that my hosts were phenomenal. They are welcoming, considerate, and very interesting people; they are both outstanding cooks; they provide their guests with everything necessary for an enjoyable stay, including train tickets and spare house keys; and they have an excellent library. If you know who they are, I recommend that you go visit them; if you do not know who they are, then I refuse to tell you, as I would not want dozens of people beating a path to their front door and requesting lodging. I am afraid that such an experience would make them ornery and kill all desire that they have for hosting people.

My last day in Berlin was longer than I wanted, insofar as I spent more time walking through the city than I had planned to do, having walked, as usual, increasingly slowly as the afternoon wore on and I grew more tired, and did not have time to watch a full movie before I left. The flight to Berlin was marked principally by my sitting in front of incredibly-annoying passengers and having an excellent view of Holland's canals, the ripples of which were clearly visible from the air (i.e., the larger ripples that one would not have even noticed from the ground, as they would have been too global to appear to be ripples). When I arrived in Leiden, the city was bathed in pellucid evening light. I biked with one of my hosts through the still streets (the other of them having taken my luggage for me via bus - another service offered free of charge) of a city that is quintessentially Dutch: the buildings along the main road have rectangular, white window frames; dark brown brick, and intermittent layers or adornments of white brick, marked many buildings' facades; narrow, winding side streets snaked off of each larger road; the city was dotted with churches and chock-full of canals; we passed a high-backed bench that looked like a sculpture of some sort made of very old brick; and we even passed one of the famous Dutch windmills. The evening was cool, and the city was clothed in evening blue. The host of mine who was biking with me said that they had just experienced a heat wave which had ended on the afternoon of my arrival, as though the city had been preparing for my arrival.

The morning after my arrival was mostly marked by a slow start, which did not prove to be any problem, as my hosts helped me work out an itinerary for the next several days and provided me with maps for some of the cities that I was going to be visiting. I went to Haarlem in the afternoon and learned that all of western Holland is so closely-connected by train that one can get from any point (in that part of the country) to any other point within an hour or so; many cities are close enough that one can reach them within a half-hour. Haarlem was not as pretty as Leiden, as it had fewer canals and a smaller city center, but it had a great many former almshouses (like Leiden itself), highlighting Holland's superlativeness as a social welfare state (Is that a term? I mean a country in which people are more or less equal - in which the divide between rich and poor is intentionally lessened.), and one of the city's main canals was so still that I could see the clouds perfectly reflected in it. At 4:00 PM I went to a free organ concert, which would have transported me if I could have lain in a soft bed with a book in my hand while listening to it (I was feeling somnolent.). It also allowed me to enter a church that would normally have cost me 2.50 Euros for free.

I took the wrong train on the way back from Haarlem, resulting in my journey's taking twice as long as it should have, but, upon my arrival in Leiden, I discovered that my navigation skills were vastly better than they were last time. I had no time biking back to my hosts' place, which I did by stopping every couple of hundred meters to check my Google map (which was, for once, accurate) and make sure that I was going the right way. It is amazing how much a few years of travel experience (and other personal growth) augments one's independence: while I could not find out which trains were going in which directions when I first visited the Netherlands, I have now grown smart enough to ask people what "Do not enter" means when it is written on overhead displays next to trains, and I can find my way around without undue difficulty. My returning late from my first day trip in Holland did not turn out to be a big deal, as my hosts had not been counting on my getting back early, and it did not get in the way of my writing, as I had already decided to throw that by the wayside. I spent the evening reading, not knowing that it was going to turn out to be one of the chief activities of my trip.

I do not want to provide a day-by-day description of each of my following day trips, especially as I have little of note to say about each of them individually. Over the four days following my trip to Haarlem, I saw Utrecht, Leiden's market and fort, Rotterdam, and Amsterdam. I could trivially have seen the Hague on the way back from Rotterdam, but I was feeling a little tired (despite having done very little in Rotterdam; I should have had plenty of energy left), and I was mostly interested in taking some pictures of Leiden's city center, which I had theretofore been unable to do because of being on my bike whenever I went through it, and continuing to read. Perhaps I was a little tired of being a tourist by the time I reached Leiden; perhaps the comforts of the home in which I stayed were enough to lure me away from more touristy day-trips. Whatever the case, I feel the spending time in Leiden itself was a good way to more intimately acquaint myself with Dutch living, and the time that I spent in Leiden was inimitably pleasant. I read three books and fragments of four other books, took day-trips that did not tire me out, and enjoyed my hosts' company (and that of their cats) during my stay. One can hardly regret not having seen more new places in light of such a successful conclusion to this trip, especially as I saw Holland with new eyes, as it were.

My observations of Dutch life, besides Holland's seeming to be better than most places at keeping the poor from dying of starvation on the streets, were many. Besides Rotterdam's having a very modern city center due to its having been bombed extensively in World War II, there are very few reminders of the war here - that is, far fewer that one noticed in Germany or Eastern Europe. The Dutch have far less Greek- and Roman-inspired architecture than the Germans, reflecting Holland's being a less grandiose and warlike country than Germany. Even Holland's statuary is humbler than that of Germany: while many German statues are gigantic and are meant to symbolize the greatness of the person or persons commemorated by them, Dutch statues are rather more whimsical, often consisting of children in various poses or of families. The Dutch countryside is not actually as monotonous as I first found it on the way to Maastricht; while it is flat, the towns that one passes between large cities, and the ever-present canals, are very pretty. Dutch people live much more closely together than North Americans, as evidenced not just by their houses' being scrunched together shoulder-to-shoulder, but by one's hearing neighboring people talking outside at night; I think that I like their fairly communal life more than the isolation of North American domiciles. Finally, Dutch people themselves are generally affable and nonthreatening. They are apt to engage foreigners in conversation and are both helpful and pleasant to talk to.

I only have two more general comments to make before trying to think of a conclusion for this summer's blog. Firstly, the Dutch train system is almost as good as that of Germany. Dutch trains are cleaner than German ones, just as prompt, and just as frequent, and they even have TVs inside of them that display one's current location and upcoming stops. The only downsides to the Dutch train system are that those very same TVs often show the railway system's logo, and nothing else, instead of the train's schedule, and stops are not orally announced as they are in German trains. Finally, Holland is so bicycle-friendly as to be pedestrian-unfriendly, so to speak: the roads are designed with such a mind for cyclists that sidewalks are often cramped, tiny, or even non-existent. This surprised me; it was a curious and somewhat risible oversight. Dutch cyclists are less reliable than those of Berlin, often switching lanes without shoulder-checking and cutting each other off. Pedestrian and cyclist movement are extremely chaotic, as cyclists are supposed to yield to pedestrians in many inconvenient situations but expect pedestrians to yield to them, and roads are often barely wide enough for one car (between the bike lanes), let alone cars going in opposite directions and trying to avoid cyclists. Holland's smallness is cute and an endearing quality in many ways, but it is a curse when it comes to roads, especially given that the pedestrians there are almost as dumb as those in Linz and seem intent on getting run over by bikers (though they rarely succeed).

As usual, I forgot to mention a whole bunch of things. Many cities in Holland employ street sweepers, making them the cleanest that I have ever visited. Amsterdam, on the other hand, is extremely dirty, so much so that one feels dirty just for having visited it. It is an architectural wonder and worth visiting as such, but it is not a city of the same cultural import, from a historical point of view, as any of the other capitals (except for Bratislava) that I visited on this trip, let alone many capitals that I have not yet visited. Holland, like Germany, has not yet invited the free restroom or public water fountain, and its free bathrooms are, unlike those of Germany, which one can find almost exclusively in fast food joints, located in churches! This was a surprise to me, given that I had not visited churches in any other country that had free bathrooms, but it struck me as humane and made sense, as churches should be places in which everyone is equal, and the length of sermons and concerts disposes people to want to use the bathroom. The fact of churches' having free bathrooms also inclines one to donate handsomely to them - that is, when they are free of charge, which is far from guaranteed in Holland.

I have had a blast writing these emails and wish that I could end this one in some earth-shattering way that would change your outlook on life. Alas, I have nothing especially significant to say except that I will continue to update my blog when I start my next trip to Europe, next summer. I have phased Tunisia out of my coming trip, both because there is more of it to see than I expected, and I would not want to see it incompletely, and because it might make more logistic sense to see all of Northern Africa in one fell swoop in a few years. It is unfortunate that the Middle East and Northern Africa are in a state of such political turmoil at the moment; one wonders if I will be able to visit them at all in a few years. I suppose that that part of the world can always wait, if the worst comes to the worst, as the cultural artifacts that I would like to see there are reasonably unlikely to disappear overnight; the only question would be that of being able to take a sufficiently-long vacation to see them all. This is a problem for future years, though. I thank you for having read my blog and exhort you to continue reading it in future summers!



Thursday 25 July 2013

Another announcement

Dear readers,

I am not going to make any more blog posts until I return to Vancouver, at which point I will make one long post for my whole stay in Leiden. Staying with family friends rather than in hostels is a vastly-different travelling experience and one that I recommend to everybody, though it would not suit me for an entire summer. I am going to continue touching up my future travel plans and, as usual, think often of them; I am going to take notes over the next few days so as to make sure to have something to say for my final blog post of this summer. I appreciate your having kept up with my blog and plan to divide it into sections, one for each year, at the start of the next summer. I plan to keep updating it (each summer), as I now have a reasonable number of readers. Goodbye for now!

Tuesday 23 July 2013

Day 53 - Potsdam

I should have noted one more thing about my diet the other day - I forgot to say that one can easily find first-rate, moderately-priced strawberries and cherries at fruit vendors' stalls all over the place in Berlin (and, as it turns out, Potsdam). The one disadvantage to buying fruit from vendors is that one is constrained to either carry it around all day or eat it at once, which is not such a big deal: half of a kilogram of cherries or strawberries is not too much to consume at once given one's hunger for fresh fruit, and it only takes around two hundred milliliters of water to wash it. Wasting water to wash fruit was not a big deal as recently as a week ago, when I often drank less than a liter of water per day (having gotten used to the heat, presumably), and, paradoxically, wasting it in the brutal Berlin heat is also not a big deal. A hundred milliliters of water here and there will not make a difference between one's having too little water and having enough: if such small quantities of water enter one's thoughts, one has far too little water to last the day in any case. I left the hostel today with two-and-a-half liters of water and was, for the first time since I got here, sufficiently hydrated all day without having to buy anything. But I have, as usual, divagated from what I was originally discussing. Fresh fruit is great, and it is an important part of my diet (both in daily life and right now).

I do not remember which city I last called a testament to human greatness, but, whichever one it was, Potsdam is greater. One quickly runs out of adjectives with which to describe cities of fantastical historical interest once one has visited a few of them, as they tend to contain many of the same things: town halls, churches, museums, cathedrals, statues, fountains, plaques, and other structures that our predecessors saw fit to build, and which we consider important monuments. What makes Potsdam special is the unbelievable number of palaces, castles, historically-interesting buildings, and royal gardens in and around it; it covers such a large area that it would take three or four days to see it all by foot. Today was, perhaps, the only time when it would have paid to take a guided bus tour around a city, as Potsdam is far too large to cover in one day, but I did not want to dole out the money to do so, and I like being on my feet and being able to decide where to go and what to pay attention to. I had an enjoyable but tiring day touring Potsdam, and I realized that travelling is a little like going to a restaurant: one cannot order everything on the menu. This struck me today in particular because of the impossibility of seeing all of Potsdam in one day, and, while I am fond of trying as many different dishes as possible, to overextend my metaphor, I realized that overdoing things today would not teach me any more, really, about Potsdam, German history, or civilization as a whole, and so I contented myself with seeing what seemed most unique and most characteristic of Potsdam. I have little more to say about it except that it is even more impressive than Berlin itself and that it is worth visiting more than once.

My final note for the day is that the Berlin subway, as it turns out, sucks; it is even worse than the one in Moscow. Although the trains here are quiet and relatively clean, the machines from which one buys tickets do not accept bills; there is almost no signage in the subway stations; stops are announced quietly and unclearly; and there are no maps, or at least no maps of a reasonable size, that show one where one is going: the only way to know where one is going is to get a map in advance (as I did because of staying in a hostel) or to have ridden the subway since childhood. I found the experience of riding it frustrating and disillusioning, but I do not expect to have any problems getting to the airport tomorrow, as I now know what to expect, and I know exactly where I have to go.

At this point, I have run out of things to say; I can only hope to have a more fruitful day writing tomorrow. I expect to be able to keep up my blog while in Leiden, but I may find it tougher than I have done, as I will be staying with people with whom I have a mutual interest in interacting, and I will probably only see them for substantive periods of time in the evening, when I usually write. On the plus side, I can always write notes to myself and finish them later, and I do not spend more than an hour or so per day writing anyway, all told. I tend to spend as much time as possible unwinding after days of tourism and often do not start writing my letters until I have spent some time on the internet or, in the case of the last two days, watched at least part of a movie. I should have time to see another movie or two tomorrow before departing for Leiden, as I will have a large chunk of free time before heading to the airport and do not plan to wear myself out. I am going to visit a small section of town that should be historically interesting and will then spend the early afternoon at the hostel. I really need to take a shower now. Sweating all day is disgusting!


I found these castle ruins north of Potsdam's most famous castle.

Monday 22 July 2013

Day 52 - Berlin

I am in much the same position as I was in yesterday: I tend to leave these posts off for as long as possible so as to relax before writing them. I am sitting in a pool of sweat as I write this; this may be the hottest time of the year in Berlin, and the heat here is merciless. I have not experienced anything quite like this heat, except, perhaps, in Vienna. It does not merely fry one's exterior, but, like a barbeque, roasts successive layers of one's tissue, singing one's skin, fat, and muscle before it turns one's bones to dust. It is not the kind of heat that leaves one wanting a shower and a cold drink, but the kind that makes one wonder if one will start crawling along the pavement on all fours and die of exposure.
 
Besides being uncomfortable, the heat here makes sightseeing much more difficult - in fact, I have discovered that walking for a long time through a city in this type of heat brings diminishing returns. One at first walks at an ordinary rate; it would seem that one only need bring enough water for a three-day hike in order to have an ordinary day of sightseeing. As time passes, the sun saps one's energy, though, making distances that should take a half-hour to traverse take instead for an hour, then two hours, and then three - one's movements grow slower at an almost geometric rate. One cannot sit down to rest, as sitting down simply results in one's sitting in the sun (in most cases; there is little shade despite the number of trees here, as benches are rarely located beneath them) and growing even more tired and thirsty. Despite their inimitable achievements in areas of culture not connected with health, the Germans have not yet discovered the public restroom or, more importantly in this case, the public water fountain, meaning that, unless one has the storage capacity for at least three liters of water (and preferably more like four or five), one has continually to buy drinks once one's initial store of water runs out; failure to consume enough liquid in this heat could lead to severe dehydration. The only results of all of this heat in my case were that I spent far more money than I would have liked to do today, took longer than I wanted to complete my itinerary, am now tired out and ready for two rather more relaxed days, and am currently bathing in my own sweat. I have to drink about a liter of water per hour (This is a very rough calculation.) just to stay alive in this hostel, as it has no air conditioning. It is so hot here that even the interiors of churches do not feel cool!

The heat has had another interesting effect on this trip, which is to disrupt one's sleep. The only reason for which I consider this interesting is that sitting in a hot train or car puts one comfortably to sleep, while lying in an overheated bed does just the opposite. Hostels, I realized last night, are an interesting experiment in human cooperation and altruism. When two of my roommates came in shortly after midnight last night, turned on all of the room's lights, and starting talking to one another, it occurred to me that the only ways for hostels to work are for people to work together: they are like those self-supporting bridges that rely on the opposite pressures of all of the blocks in them (say, ten blocks, for simplicity's sake, none of which could hold up on its own) to stay up. If people steal each other's food, keep each other awake at night, fail to wash dishes after using them, make a mess of the bathroom, or steal each other's belongings, the whole system breaks down; one or two people could ruin the atmosphere of an entire hostel. It has been my bad luck to share rooms with some terrible roommates on this trip, and it has been my good luck to share rooms with some excellent roommates; their distribution appears to me to be almost random, though cities with a renowned nightlife and larger hostels may tend to attract a worse crowd. My only conclusion from my experiences so far is that people cooperate some of the time and fail to cooperate some of the time; they are not distinctly good or bad, but good and bad by turns.

I suppose that it is time for me to start writing about Berlin. I told one of the hostel managers here, prior to leaving the hostel for the day, that I would rather hide under one of the tables than go outside. She understood me perfectly: the city is enormous, and one does not want to miss anything; as she pointed out, one has to accept that one will miss some things, as the city is too big for one to see everything. My first destination of the day was Alexanderplatz, which reeked of garbage and was essentially a construction yard surrounded by high-rises. One of the things besides restrooms and drinking fountains that the Germans have not yet discovered, as far as I can tell, is Air-Care: the exhaust coming out of a couple of trucks in Alexanderplatz was enough to choke one. I quickly escaped the air and found myself in one of the most magnificent parts of Europe that I had ever seen. Museums and cathedrals sprouted like Chanterelle (sp?) mushrooms in the city center and reminded one of the commitment of residents of Berlin to preserving history and learning more about it. I forget what I was going to say at this point, but I hope that I had an intelligent point of some sort to make. Right - something that surprised me about Berlin was that, unlike Vienna, which seems almost like a planned city, insofar as it almost has concentric circles of museums, art galleries, and churches leading into its city center, like the rings on a tree, Berlin's greatest monuments are spread all over the place. It has some fantastic towers and statues a kilometer or two away from the city center; it has some well-known sights (i.e., places marked on the city map) that turn out to suck; and it has some gems on which one stumbles unexpectedly, such as its Literature House and the various wings of its biggest (or, at least most visible) university. I feel that a lot of my time spent walking today was, to a degree, wasted, as I saw a lot of stuff on which I could have passed, but one does not know in advance what will be worthwhile, and it is not a waste to discover more about its city. Berlin is not the greatest city for walking despite its copious sidewalks and working traffic lights, as it has very wide boulevards and is chock full of cars. The city's greenness helps to allay the effects of walking alongside so many cars, but one still ends up feeling more tired than one would do walking along narrow side-streets devoid of cars. Sights in various parts of the city still stand out in my mind, but my overall memory of the day is of walking increasingly more slowly and unwillingly as the day progressed and sweating profusely; the day melted into a sweaty, amorphous haze in my mind. I have noticed that there are more bikers here than in any other city in Germany and that people have a habit of stacking garbage right next to garbage cans once they overflow (which is often, as they are too small and too few) rather than leaving it scattered everywhere as people in unmentionable countries do. I have no other cultural insights about the city except that the east side of the city, according to my map, turns out to be vastly more interesting than the west side, which must be the more modern side.
 
Perhaps my most striking experience today, despite having to buy multiple bottled drinks just to survive, was of walking along yet another Berlin Wall memorial, this one including a section of the real wall. It was strange to walk along freely and feel the breeze from the river Spree along my face when people struggled and were shot here, inexorably separated from a patch of ground just a yard away from them, twenty-five years ago. I wonder if we could do entirely without such walls given the grief that they cause people; I do not know whether they are primitive and inhumane or if they are actually necessary in some cases. While the wall in Berlin was used to oppress people, the wall along the East Bank has, as far as my knowledge extends, done more good than bad (i.e., lessened the amount of violence there), while the barrier between the U.S.A. and Mexico is stopping a gigantic number of people from emigrating or working by day in the U.S. and returning home by night. I do not know if it is fair to bar Mexicans from entering the United States in the interests of protecting American jobs and keeping law and order; I have not researched the situation enough to have an opinion. To remove all barriers to people's moving freely about the globe strikes me as naïve, based on my observations of other people in the hostels that I have visited: someone will inevitably abuse their freedom of movement if it increases, though that same person probably abuses it whether or not it remains limited; it is impossible to stop all criminal activity. I forgot to mention yesterday how idiotic I find it that Arab countries refuse entry into their country to people who show evidence of having visited Israel. First off, such people are not automatically more likely to cause damage to their countries than people who have not visited Israel; to deny them entry into one's country is tantamount to denying Christians (or blacks, or women, or people of any other grouping denomination) into one's university because one personally dislikes them. Secondly, there is no evidence (that I know of) that having people from other cultures in one's country is bad for it; on the contrary, it is often very useful, as I have pointed out in a prior blog post (consider Arabic numerals, Ancient Greek philosophy and anatomy, Roman law, &c.). Finally, people can easily have visited Israel (e.g., with a different passport) and enter an Arab country nonetheless! The refusal of people into one's country on the grounds of their having visited a country that one dislikes is a show of troglodytic prejudice.

I do not have too much left to discuss (at least, nothing jumps to mind) beside my diet. What is interesting about my diet is that, besides having cut baked goods out of it, I have also decided against eating ice cream for the next few days (and, possibly, the rest of this trip). I have had enough of it; I already know how it tastes. It is curious how one's appetites change. I have discovered a nearby bakery that sells good yogurt, sandwiches (on the cheap, too), and fizzy apple juice, which are all that I will need in addition to this hostel's complimentary breakfasts and the dinner that I made today, spaghetti (flavored with the hostel's spices) and mixed vegetables. I have run out of things to say about food.

On the subway ride back to the hostel today, I learned that Berlin's subway is not actually cooler than Moscow's, though it is monitored by videocamera and does not have any drunks on it, unlike the subway in Moscow. Like in Moscow, beggars often get on the subway, and, to my surprise, they get a fair (i.e., loose change) amount of money. I do not know if one should give money to beggars or not, and I rarely do so, mostly out of parsimony. I feel terrible seeing someone reduced to begging and free incredibly grateful to the people who give beggars money, as I suspect that they are lessening the amount of human suffering in the world by doing so. Perhaps this makes me a hypocrite; my having seen so many beggars in Moscow and knowing that beggars in Vancouver spend their money on drugs is probably what has made me loath to give them money. My only other note of interest is that one of my roommates in this hostel was very surprised by Berlin's culture. He said that he had come to Berlin expecting to see fat people drinking beer and eating sausages, and instead he heard all sorts of talk about a famous wall that divided the city in two; he wanted to know who put it up and if it still existed. I cannot rightly make fun of him here, as there are probably many elementary things that I do not know about the world, but this particular instance of ignorance was a real surprise to me - I did not realize that anyone could not know about the Berlin Wall (Perhaps children in schools in Australia are taught different things.).

My plan for tomorrow is to visit Potsdam, and my plan for the day after tomorrow is to see a small, and interesting, section of Berlin that I have not yet explored. I expect these two days to be relaxed and to leave me with time to see a couple of movies; I knew that today's excursion would be tiring and planned in advance to take it relatively easy for a couple of days so as to get my energy back. I also need to find out from which airport I will be flying out on Wednesday; it turns out that there are two of them in Berlin. Goodbye for now!

I should add one thing, as it just occurred to me that I would be writing three posts about one and the same city for the first time on this blog. If you are going to visit one city in all of Germany, Berlin is the city to see: it is somehow the most German of all German cities. Its being so German is defined in part by the amalgamation of cultures in the cities, its number of young people, its active subculture, its particolored cultural backdrop, and its acceptance of foreign cultures. I suppose that I have said the same thing over and over again in different terms: all sorts of cultures and people are welcome here; there is just as much room for the young skateboarder with purple hair as there is for the staid professor of law, young mother, Turkish immigrant, African immigrant, European immigrant, car dealer, or plumber here - anything goes. The commitment to incorporating elements of other cultures into its own without losing its own idiosyncratic cultural foundations seems to especially characterize Germany these days. Berlin is a very modern city with a richer history than any other city that I have visited in Europe; the confluence of old and new, like the commitment to cultural exchange, seems especially German. One can easily find the fat people eating sausages and drinking beer whom my roommate sought when he came here, and one can easily find the jovial burgher with thick side whiskers who has never spoken, and will never speak, any other language than German, in Berlin; Berlin does not fail to be German because of having so many young people and being so open to cultural innovation. I do not know how else to define the city than this. I am glad to have seen much of the rest of Germany (and to be planning to see the north in two years), as I would feel consternation at someone's having seen only Berlin and having claimed to have "seen Germany," yet I feel as though the whole country were summed up in Berlin in particular, and I am happy to be ending my tour of Germany here. Goodbye again!
 
You should see this wall. It is worth it.
 

Sunday 21 July 2013

Day 51 - Berlin

I am once again in an excellent (or at least very good) hostel, which is a plus, but one minus is that the excellent Wi-Fi connection here has distracted me from my writing. Having fallen upon some interesting videos on Youtube (which counted as being useful in some way, as they were in Russian), I decided against starting to write until 10:00 PM; though I do not feel all too tired, I do not like to go to bed late when staying in hostels, as I would not want to wake up my roommates (if they are in), and I will need to get up early tomorrow - that is, not delay all morning - as I have a big day ahead of me. I saw a tiny chunk of Berlin today and plan to see almost the entire historic center of Berlin tomorrow, Potsdam the day after tomorrow, and a small section of Berlin the day after, on the day on which I will fly to Amsterdam (in the evening), perhaps following a period of rest at the hostel. While one wants to see as much new stuff as possible when travelling, I expect to have seen everything that I came to see by the early afternoon, if not lunchtime, on Wednesday, and resting a bit before my flight might lead me to spend my time more profitably in Holland - one never knows. I feel a bit of regret at returning to Holland, as I have already seen it before, but I would not be surprised if one could see a country from a different perspective when returning to it (though I hope to do so, in most cases, in future; Austria is one exception to this rule) later on, especially if one sees new cities, as I plan to do. I had so little idea of what to do when I first came to Europe that I feel a little that my trip in 2010 was wasted, though one always falls while learning to walk, to so speak.

I have gotten off-track, though: I wanted to say that I would write this post as quickly as I could, not censoring myself as I wrote or thinking for too long over each new point that I wanted to make, as I want to finish this quickly and take a shower. I am sorry if it turns out a little more disjointedly than usual; at the very least, its being disjointed would reflect my current state of mind. Leipzig's central train station was woefully understaffed, to the extent that I waited for twenty-five minutes without getting any service before deciding to buy a ticket myself from a ticket machine, sacrificing any chance of getting the kind of good deal that railway staff often give one by finding one regional passes and clever routes that keep the cost of one's ticket down. I have been disappointed in general by the cost of rail travel in Eastern Germany; perhaps it is no greater than that of rail travel in the rest of Germany, and I am merely travelling longer distances than I was before; whatever the cost, I feel as though it were bankrupting me, though it will fall sharply now that I am more or less staying in one place for the next few days. Staying in Berlin is actually a little more expensive than staying in any other country that I have visited, as one cannot possibly get around the city without using the subway, which costs 2.40 Euros for a one-way ticket. The subway here is much quieter, cleaner, and cooler (though it is not fully air-conditioned; that would entail a giant waste of energy) than that of Moscow, though its signage is worse. I feel ashamed to trump anything in Russia over its equivalent in Germany, but I have to admit that it is easier to find one's way around the Moscow subway than it is to get around the Berlin subway.

I did not see too much on the way from Leipzig to Berlin except for my book, a huge number of windmills, and a mother's comforting her toddler by handing him an iPhone, which he began to manipulate with a look of unbroken composure and concentration. Jane Austen has turned out to be a good author who disliked the social pretensions of the people around her and saw that Britons in the early-19th century were fixated on class distinctions. When I arrived in Berlin, I stepped out of the train into a futuristic, five-storey train station that was clean, full of shops, and full of signs. The only flaw to the train station that I could find was that there was no sign within it pointing to the bus station, though that was easy enough to find (after time wasted looking in the wrong place for it) if one stepped outside and looked for nearby buses that did not have the word "tour" on them. I was intimated as soon as I stepped outside of the train station. There was an electric display showing which buses were going to leave next, and I missed mine. Another bus going towards my hostel left only eight minutes after the first and took me through a very affluent-looking section of town, full of high-rises and steel-and-glass offices. I immediately noticed, looking out of the window, that Berlin went in, to speak anthropomorphically, for massive monuments, like Vienna. This I found curious, as it cannot have been Germany's capital for very long - the country only became a country, in the common sense of the word, about 150 years ago (before which it was a collection of separate states), meaning that Berlin cannot have been groomed for the role of capital city for very long. My theory now is that the city's large monuments merely correspond with its large size, and not with regality, but I have to first describe the city to tell you why.

It is hard to find a place at which to start in describing Berlin - it is the most incredible city that I have ever seen. It has extremely wide boulevards and a huge number of trees for such a car-friendly town. It is full of cyclists and people with even more tattoos, piercings, dreadlocks, and weirdly-colored hair than citizens of the rest of the country (if that is even possible). Cigarette smoke has replaced the air here. It is full of cafes and bars. It is full of monuments, so many that one could not put them all on a map: one bumps into them unexpectedly as one walks, just as one walks past stop signs in an ordinary city. The cyclists here are, unlikely those of Dresden and (especially) Leipzig, completely uninterested in killing people: they ride at a reasonable pace, and when pedestrians get in their way, they ring their bells instead of trying to impale them. Berlin is a city of irrepressible vitality where people accept each other as they are, life is enjoyed, and people consciously try to build a better future for themselves. It is a city full of immigrants and the most German of all Germans, people who are freer and happier than in any other city that I have visited here (even Dresden, where people seemed exceptionally friendly). It is a city full of bums, nutcases, and tourists. Every square inch of available space is covered in graffiti here, so much so that a few tourists from Detroit, a fellow traveler told me, got seriously scared when they first went outside here, as they took the graffiti for gang symbols. It is a city of unequalled variety, one in which one could spend whole years without growing bored. It is a little like a grander, more modern, wealthier Warsaw, a city in which past and present have fused together and prance hand-in-hand into the future. I am tired of this paragraph, but I have more to say.

The most impressive thing about Berlin, as it has been in many cities that I have visited, is its history. I am specifically thinking of its memory of the Holocaust and the Berlin Wall, as those are the only two memorials that I have seen in the tiny part of the city that I visited today. The Holocaust memorial that I saw today was in one of the subway stations, and someone had stopped to read it: Berliners do not forget their past. The memorial to the Berlin Wall that I saw was phenomenal. It was an open museum located where the wall used to be. There were photos of the Berlin Wall at various points of its existence (including its destruction) on the sides of buildings located where it used to be, and there was even a faux fence, a series of poles set a foot or so apart from one another, set up to make one feel as though the people and objects sitting on the other side of the fence were separated by a real wall. The Berlin Wall display, which covered three full city blocks, included many plaques explicating, in German and English, the history of the Berlin Wall; it was accompanied by an audio recording, which included a reading of the names of people killed for trying to escape from East Germany into West Germany, whose death was honored with a single, wooden, meter-high cross. The whole area had an eerie, very gloomy feel to it, reminding one that the Berlin Wall was something real to the people living here, not just a symbol of Soviet oppression. (Before I forget, I should point out that, while the touristy parts of town are very busy, one can step out of them into side streets that are empty besides a few locals going about their business. The multifarious layers of this city are enrapturing!) The fact that this display is open to anyone who wants to visit it and that it is located right next to a park and ordinary apartment buildings just goes to show how intricately history is interlinked with life in Berlin.

I could go on and on about Berlin, I should think, but I have one more germane point to make. Part of Germany's infinite superiority over Russia, which I bring up so much because I love parts of Russian culture but hate the country and its government as a whole, is exemplified in the Germans' capacity both to remember historical wrongdoing (committed both by and against them) and to take steps to prevent its recurrence. One thing that shocked and enraged me about Russia when I first visited it was my discovery of its leaders' devotion to empty rhetoric. It is plain to anyone with half of a brain that Stalin repressed and killed tens of millions of people and was one of the most horrid political leaders in human history; it is at least as apparent that the Soviet Union's controlling East Germany for forty-four years was both immoral and incompetent (as exemplified by people's wanting to leave East Germany for the West). Nonetheless, if one were to ask a Russian about this (especially one involved in politics), he would say something like, "Politics was different then." If one were to corner him and ask simply if it was right for the Soviet Union to occupy East Germany (ignoring Eastern Europe; Russians almost unilaterally think that Russia's occupation of Eastern Europe was beneficial to all parties), he would repeat himself in different words, saying that the political climate of the second half of the twentieth century was different from what it is now and required different policies. Russians will never admit to having made a mistake: while they privately grumble about their presidents, and the smartest (or most temerarious, or what have you) among them even openly oppose them, they have good things to say about all of their past leaders except for Gorbachev, who is universally viewed as a traitor and a coward. Stalin is said to have ruled Russia with an iron fist; Khruschev is said to have continued stolidly with Stalin's policies; Brushev is said to have guided the country into the late-20th century; Yeltsin is said to have helped to establish a new, capitalistic order in the country (despite the fact that he did nothing but drink and give power to bandits, who robbed the people blind); Putin is going to be praised for having introduced 21st-century politics, whatever that means, to Russia, despite the fact that his sole actions in government are to steal money; and so on. It infuriates me that cannot admit to the mistakes of their leaders and would never admit to historical mistakes, turning instead to fine, empty phrases to avoid addressing the country's mistakes head-on. Germany does not do this, and it is now one of the most advanced countries in the whole world, having risen from rubble at the end of World War II, at which point it cannot have been in a better position than Russia (besides having the economic support, if I am not mistaken, of the USA). Until Russians learn to see politics level-headedly and describe political actions with words that mean something, they will never hold their government responsible for anything, and their country will remain in the dirt. Germans demand change and fight for it, while Russians drink vodka and praise the people who steal their last crust of bread from them. That is the difference - or one of the many differences - between these two countries.

So much for politics! I am going to see vastly more of Berlin tomorrow and will surely have more to say about it. When I arrived in Berlin, I did not actually want to get off of the train: I would have liked to have remain reading on the train for hours; I may have been tired. I feel recharged at this point, or at least sufficiently irked to have seen relatively little today that I will push myself to see as much as possible tomorrow before enjoying two relaxed days (as Potsdam, it turns out, does not take a whole day to see). One of my few remaining notes is that, for all that I hated Leipzig, I saw a few pairs of lesbians there. While this may not sound so significant, I think that any city in which homosexuals feel comfortable enough to outwardly show affection to one another must be doing something right. I forgot to mention that I had a doner (or shawarma, or whatever - a Turkish wrap) and that I may have gotten sick of pastries. I recently went on a three-day purge of baked goods, having eaten them each morning in Dresden, and, when I ate one today, I discovered that I had (temporarily - I am sure that it will come back by around Christmas time, if not far sooner) lost my taste or them. The pastry that I bought tasted just like all of the others that I had bought in Germany and did not surprise or pleasure me in any way; I have eaten so many pastries on this trip that, at this point, I just want to eat some normal food. I will have the chance to do that over the next few days (and beyond, as I will be staying with people and, therefore, eat everyday food), as I have some spaghetti and mixed vegetables from my stay in Leipzig (where I could not cook, as my hostel had no kitchen), I have enough food for a perfectly-normal lunch tomorrow, and I expect to have a relaxed enough couple of days on Tuesday and Wednesday to take the time to have lunch in a café, which I have not been able to do until now because I have been too busy seeing sights each day to sit down for a relaxed lunch (As the Russians say, do your work and then relax; one has to see all of a city's sights before sitting down to eat!). There are plenty of cheap cafes in Berlin, though I was unable to try any of them tonight, as I could not find the German beerhouse that this hostel's employees recommended to me, and, since I was told that the Turkish wraps here were especially good, I decided to have one for dinner. While I was told that the huge number of Turkish immigrants in Berlin made the city's Turkish wraps here especially good, I discovered that a Turkish wrap tastes like a Turkish wrap; the only difference between Turkish wraps here and in Hungary is that the ones in Hungary give one food poisoning, while the ones here merely give one mild heartburn. I have decided to avoid Turkish wraps, as I had been doing until today for fear of getting sick again, for the next several months, it not longer. In fact, I am going to avoid unhealthy food in general, as I already know what it tastes like and have plenty of it (and very high-quality junk food, at that) over the course of this trip; I have nothing more to discover in that area for the time being. My final note about Berlin is that it is full of music and that people get together on Sundays for giant, fair-like meetings at an open market full of live musical performances. While it would be naïve to say that people here are all connected in some inexpressible, intangible way, they nonetheless love to get together somewhat spontaneously for the sake of enjoying one another's company and being in a crowd. It turns out that I am drawn to cultures that encourage such meetings and consider people social creatures, as I consider the culture here much more amenable than that of Vancouver, where everyone is as alone as in a solitary cell.

I have only one more point - or, rather, two. First, I would have liked to write or to make my points in some sort of order, but I did not have time for that and am in a rush to send this email, take a shower, and go to bed. My final point is that I was going to write about my future travel plans despite yesterday's promise not to do so, as they are fairly interesting. In short, I am interested in seeing the rest of medieval Europe (Scandinavia, Denmark, Belgium, France, England, Spain, and Portugal), Southern Europe, almost all of the countries surrounding the Mediterranean Sea, and parts of Southern Asia. Medieval Europe interests me for its allowing one to see how people used to live, the Mediterranean for the richness of the cultures that have developed around it, and Southern Asia partly for its natural beauty and partly for its foreignness. It turns out that some of the best Roman ruins in the world are located in Muslim countries, which would not bother me except that the Arab world is presently going berserk. My plan is to visit Tunisia for a few days next year as long as it stays politically stable and to leave other Arab countries off for a couple of years; if things do not get any better, I will have to leave some monumental Roman ruins unexplored (for the time being). That more or less sums up what I had to say. I wish that I were better at scheduling my time so that I could say what I had to say and still go to bed early!


This is the model for many of Berlin's side streets.
 

Saturday 20 July 2013

Day 50 - Erfurt

I am going to have to keep this post short, both because I am itching to go downstairs and use the internet (but do not want to do focussed work, like writing, there, as there are too many flies), and because I have nothing much to say. Erfurt fit the bill exactly: it was a pleasant, very beautiful medieval town with churches, theaters, museums, and the houses of important former residents coming out of the woodwork. It had a spectacular cathedral square with what looked like two cathedrals, though one of them was surely just a glorified church, and it had one city square that was called, oddly, "Anger." The areas outside of the city center were not, like in Halle, dead, though that may have been because it is a Saturday; there were several burbling creeks running through the city; and there were three synagogues (or, perhaps, monuments to Judaism), none of which I could find, in the city center. My only real note about the city is that several parts of it, including its central plaza, were under construction: Germany is rebuilding itself! The widespread construction in this part of Germany is the only sign that it is behind the rest of the country in any way - that and its having poorer trains. The brakes on the trains here screech like in the rest of Eastern Europe, though they are much better-ventilated than their eastern equivalents, and the people living here are sensible enough to leave the windows open when possible. In all other ways Eastern Germany appears to me to be just like the western part of the country, though this may be because I have failed to make some germane observation or other.

The train ride to and from Erfurt was, as train rides often are, eventful. On the way there I finished reading "The Bacchae," which I enjoyed immensely; I have discovered that I prefer Euripides to Shakespeare. I find Euripides much more focused on ideas than Shakespeare, who devoted a lot of energy to very complicated plots with large casts of characters, and I prefer the rhetoric of Ancient Greek speakers to that of Shakespeare's characters. It seems to me that, while the speakers in Euripides' plays are meant to be duplicitous at times and sometimes outright wrong, they still speak in such a way (as rendered by the translation that I read) that one can follow their arguments and gauge them for oneself, while Shakespeare's characters merely speak in circles, weaving their words in such a way as to say almost nothing at all. Euripides' characters have provocative philosophical debates, while Shakespeare's characters can turn "good morning" into five lines of nonsense that one has to fight to decode. I probably already mentioned having decided to read Sophocles and Aeschylus; it turns out that the Greeks had a lot to say about the human condition that is relevant today and that they set a solid groundwork for future Western literary endeavors.

The train ride back from Erfurt was, perhaps, more exciting thant the train ride there, as I paid more attention to the landscape. Despite being halfway between wakefulness and sleep, I saw several rivers, rolling hills of forest, some impressive churches, and even a couple of castles on the way to Leipzig. I did not take any notes today, not being in the mood to do so, and have exhausted my store of things to say in this post. It is frustrating to me to sometimes run out of commentary, as I cannot seem to control whether or not I have a lot to say; on some days, I am bursting with new impressions, while on others, I have pleasant or unpleasant days but take little away from them. I am now going downstairs to surf the internet and continue reworking my travel plans for the next few years. While it might sound silly to be planning so far ahead, I am guaranteed, unless the University of Arkansas shuts down, to be in graduate school for the next few years, and it is trivial to plan around the time that I will spend there. The only uncertainty for the coming three years is whether or not I will spend a year abroad in Russia, but even that is not a big roadblock for my planning. My basic idea is to spend the next two years visiting Europe before seeing parts of Southern Asia and even Latin America; I would write more about this, but I cannot imagine that it is interesting to anyone but me. I hope that my time in Berlin motivates me to write more. Perhaps I am simply a little tired of writing.


Two cathedrals in one square? Impossible!

Friday 19 July 2013

Day 49 - Halle

I begun my day feeling better about this hostel, as the only things seriously wrong with it are that it has extremely-limited internet access (not because of the internet itself, but because of the conditions in which one must use it) and that it has no kitchen. The woman who got my stuff out of the fridge for me this morning said, in direct contrast with the coworker of hers whom I saw yesterday, that it was no problem for the hostel to store my food, and she even lent me a spoon. Since I only spent 10 Euros on food the other day, and since some of that money was for non-perishable food and food that I have already eaten, it would not even be a total disaster if - and this is unlikely to happen - the hostel personnel simply threw my food out. I am not going to be bankrupted by having to eat out for three nights in a row, though I may be dissuaded from doing so at all in Berlin, and I both have a comfortable room and am not constrained to spend much of my time in Leipzig: given that I can take day-trips to more interesting cities, I am not all that limited by staying in a bad hostel in a bad city. I thought of this, before realizing that it was a bad analogy, as ersatz camping this morning, as, like when camping, I am dealing with some degree of privation; whatever the case, I only have one more day to spend in this abominable city before I can leave it for good, rush through Berlin (as it is a big city for a 2.5-day visit; I am going to spend one day in Potsdam), and fly to Amsterdam for the final leg of my trip.

My trip to Halle returned me to medieval Europe. I was initially struck by the eery silence of the streets leading to the city center: while it was easy to find the city center, the city at first seemed dead. There were other people on the sidewalks to my right and left, but none of them were talking. No birds sang, no cars drove past; it was as quiet as in many churches. The noise and activity levels picked backed up when I got to the city's main plaza, where I found the tourist office, conveniently situated. It turns out that Halle is full of museums and historic houses - among others, it had a Beatles museum! The city first rose to prominence because of its salt stores and soon secured its place as a cultural center in Eastern Germany with its royal residence (not quite a palace - I do not know what to call it), plenitude of clergymen, and university life - it has one of the better universities in this part of the country. I enjoyed walking through it and especially liked its inordinate number of plaques marking the houses in which its leading scholars, doctors, lawyers, men of state, and other most important citizens lived. The city has a museum and a music hall devoted to so-and-so Handel (I do not, regrettably, know his first or middle names), and it has one of the nicer memorials for slain Jews that I have seen in Europe, an unostentatious arch with some inscriptions on it on a little side street. The fact that Holocaust victims are remembered in every city of cultural import in Germany impresses me; I wonder if one can find as many memorials per city for victims of atrocities as one can find here.

The only other two things worth noting about Halle are that one of its churches had a very interesting interior, with a honeycomb meeting of arches at the ceiling and filigree engravings on its walls, and that the city was full of construction. While I did not consider the construction in Dresden to signal much on its own, that two large cities out of the three that I have visited in Eastern Germany have been full of construction may indicate the East's still struggling to catch up to the West. I will reserve comment on this until I have seen Erfurt, which is one of the largest and most important cities in this area, as I do not want to jump to any hasty conclusions; suffice it to say that cities in the East have not seemed any poorer than those in the West so far.

That just about covers my comments for today. I have fallen for the restaurant that I visited yesterday despite its being a little strange, as one can eat good food cheaply there. While I had a similar dish to the one that I ate last night, as it contained salmon, which I take to be the healthiest food in the world, and spinach, which I consider the healthiest vegetable, I have decided to try something new tomorrow to get more food for my money without having to eat fast food. About Leipzig itself I have a few more things to say. The bathrooms here are 250 times more expensive than those in parts of the Czech Republic, which makes sense given people's relative wealth in the two areas, and travel by train here must be twice as expensive or so as train travel in the Czech Republic. This also makes sense, as, in East Germany, one travels to places that one would want to visit on trains on which one would like to ride, while in the Czech Republic one rides miserable trains to miserable places; sometimes, paying less is not the better option. The train station here, while it initially attracted me by dint of its size, is terrible: it is closer to being a shopping mall than a train center. One can find the ticket office if one looks hard enough, but the atmosphere of the train station, like that of Stuttgart's train station, is unpleasant. Finally, cyclists here are crazier than in any other city that I have visited, and many drivers here are crazy, too. Together, they conspire to hit as many pedestrians as they can, though I have not seen them manage to hit anyone so far. I am going, anachronistically, to write my email about Leipzig and, if I still have time, watch part of a movie in the fly-infested, super-heated lobby of this hostel. Goodbye!


Look! Another medieval city center!
 

Day 48 - Leipzig

I have a large number of notes to get through in this post, which I am writing after having finished my email about Halle. My first note is about the hostel that I visited: some of the people whom I met there, including some from Singapore, were very interesting. One of the people from Singapore told me that men there have to serve for two years in the army and then return to the army periodically for several years; they look at their return trips to the army as vacations, as service is often less stressful than work. This same person also told me that he was glad of Singapore's stringest laws concerning cleanliness and general disorderliness, as he found Rome, Nice, Florence, and other cities that he and his friends had visited dirty and poorly-managed. Finally, it was interesting to me that this man and his friends spoke English with one another: it was their only common language, and yet they spoke it with a strong accent, as though it were their second language. It turns out that almost everyone in Singapore speaks English and only some of the people there speak another language; while Malay is the country's second official language, many Singaporeans are descended from immigrants from other Asian countries, and they grow up principally speaking English. This goes to show what I know about other countries: I had always assumed that people in Singapore spoke English and Mandarin Chinese!

Looking back on my notes, it is easy to see why I was so upset when I got here. I had a slow morning, exacerbated by my having gotten buttonholed by someone who talked and talked as I was trying to leave the hostel and having had to wait over an hour for the train to Leipzig. Since the train station in the new town is hugely undeveloped, I had to wait outside next to a group of alcoholic bums, and I felt as though I had stepped into a sauna when I stepped out of the train station in Leipzig. The hostel employee who greeted me took ages to check me in, did not tell me anything about my room or about Leipzig itself, tried to charge me for four nights despite my having emailed the hostel several days previously to inform its staff that I was shortening my stay by one night, did not mention that the hostel had free wi-fi, and did not mention that the hostel had no kitchen and no fridge. The hostel's lobby, lacking either windows or air conditioning, was like a furnace, and it was infested with flies. When I asked the hostel employee who had greeted me if day-trips to Halle and Erfurt made sense, she shrugged her shoulders; when I asked her about sights outside of the city center that might interest me, she tried to sell me a 10-Euro ticket for a bus tour; she told me to go shopping at the train station when I asked her about local supermarkets; and when I asked her where I could get cheap, traditional German food, she recommended to me what turned out to be a hip cafe and bar with neon lighting and over a hundred tables. When I went to the cafe to eat, I was approached by a very strange and drunk woman who kept saying that she was boring until I finally told her to go away. Leipzig itself was hideous - that is a whole other story.

My first observation about Leipzig was that it is a terrible city for walking. It is full of highways, has very few crosswalks, has a dearth of street signs, and even occasionally allows cars in the pedestrian-only zones, of which there are few. There is a huge number of bums and indigent immigrants from the Near East in a park near the train station, which I saw before I saw any of the city's attractions; it has seemed to me for the whole duration of this trip that immigrants from the Near East often turn out to be the poorest people in Germany, and there were very many of them in Leipzig. Leipzig has a fair number of statues, but one cannot discern what any of them are in honor of, as they lack clear writing and do not always represent anything specific. The city center is composed almost entirely of stores rather than buildings of historic interest, and fewer of its citizens smoke than in the rest of Germany - they are not real Germans. While Dresden has modernized in tandem with preserving its history, Leipzig has grown ultra-modern and thrown history out of the window; it is a little like Stuttgart with a world-class university. Many of the city's best attractions, such as the older buildings of its university campus and a street stall from which I bought good strawberries and phenomenal cherries for a reasonable price, are located outside of the city center, in which there is nothing to see except for the city's town hall (which can just as easily be seen from parts of the university campus outside of the city center) and one of its central churches, which has one of the most creative, unusual interiors that I have so far seen in Germany - it has supporting columns topped with carvings made to look like plants, and its walls are painted, rather than inset with stained-glass windows. Leipzig looks like a nice city in which to live based on its city map, as it appears to be very green, is not too crowded, and has fountains in its central plazas, but it is a wretched place to visit.

I have gotten through many of my notes unscathed - I only have a bit left to write about. One of my remaining notes is that I found a bookstore in which one could buy reasonably-priced books here. Books seemed to be getting increasingly-more expensive until I found this bookstore, where I found a section of classics that each cost 3.5 Euros - barely more than one would pay for a book at a used book store. The classics section was comprised entirely of Shakespeare and Victorian novels, which are, apparently, all that Germans (that is, German booksellers) consider to be English-language classics (This is probably because of salability more than ignorance.). I considered getting Dickens' "Hard Times," but, having read five pages of "A Tale of Two Cities" and execrated it, I decided against it. The Bronte sisters did not sound too distinguished to me, but Jane Austen, whose work is considered quite important, caught my interest. It sounded like some work or other named after a pond was the novel of hers that was the broadest in scope, so I went for it: my entertainment for the week or so following my finishing "The Bacchaes" lies in her hands. I have not actually finished reading "The Bacchaes"; in fact, I just recently started it (the fourth of the four plays included in my collection of Euripides' work). It is curious to come across English words in their original setting: while I knew that corybantic, maenad, dionysian, saturnine, stygian, and so on all came from Greek, I did not know that their meanings could be perverted. That is, while dionysian is taken to mean "given over entirely to the bodily passions" (unless I am mistaken) in English, it does not appear to have meant that to the Greeks. At the point of the play that I have reached (the very beginning), Dionysus seems pretty mad about some treachery or other that was commmitted against him, as a result of which he has driven a bunch of women mad and decided to revenge himself on his offender. The mad women in the play, while they would be described by us as dionysian, are not true followers of Dionysus, as he has preached unbridled bodily worship to them out of spite, not as an exposition of his actual worldviews. I will have to read further to find out if we have perverted the meaning of the word dionysian - to find out, more precisely, if we have falsely associated Dionysus with surrender to bodily pleasure - but so far suspect that his name has been misused in our language.

Now I am even closer to the end of my notes: I have established that Leipzig is a repugnant city that one should avoid at all costs and that my hostel sucks. I noted that for every good day, one is bound to have a bad day or two - that is how life, and travel, works. Having pitied the young man from Singapore who had seen only Nice, Paris, Rome, and Florence and would have said that he had seen France and Italy, I have concluded that travelling as I have done, combing a country for treasures outside of big cities as well as inside of them, is the right way to learn about other cultures, though I may have taken my search a bit too far in visiting every little village (or so it seems) in Germany. Again, this might be a lesson that I can use in future in order to turn a mistake into something good; I might be saving myself future wasted time by wasting time now and, in so doing, learning not to do it. I saw fields of sunflowers, fields of solar panels, and fields of the lavender for which Southern France is so famous on the train ride here, and it occurred to me that travelling restores one's faith in humanity. While it is possible that one only thinks this because of being shielded, while travelling, from all of the bad in the world (as one tries to avoid visiting unpleasant places, though one often fails), my overall experience has shown me that people are generally good. All of the people who have helped me, smiled at me, chatted with me, or otherwise done something to make my days better have shown me that people have an overwhelming propensity to try to improve the world; all of the monuments to human ingenuity, tenacity, and courage that I have seen on this trip have reinforced in my mind that people are committed to making life better for one another and for humanity as a whole and that they are generally proficient at doing so. Perhaps this view is a little naive, but it is a welcome thought on a bad day, and if it is an illusion, it is at least a very pleasant one to maintain. The absence of any such belief would, in any case, be crippling: it is better to believe in something motivating but slightly false than to believe in nothing at all. With that thought I leave you to watch part of a movie and continue planning my trips for future years. One cannot get enough of travel!


The strangest wall in Europe belongs to Leipzig.
 

Thursday 18 July 2013

Day 47 - Meissen and Moritzburg

I am lucky that I took some notes earlier in the day, as I do not have much to say about my trips to Meissen and Moritzburg except that I am lucky to have arrived in Europe on June 1, as my emails have been trivial to number due to my first day's having been June 1 and June's having 30 days. I started my day angry, as I missed the train to Meissen due to a confluence of unlucky circumstances, but I was mollified by the train and bus ride to Meissen and by reading a little more of Euripides, whose work is fascinating. I saw four hawks today, three of which were in the fields (hunting rodents, presumably) and one of which was putting on a show in Meissen itself, repeatedly swooping down and soaring back upwards over the bridge to the old city. The hawks' flying so low reminded me that I know next to nothing about their feeding habits: while one would expect them to fly hundreds of meters high, like bald eagles, so that their prey not see them, it appears that being high up is not always useful to them. I do not know how often or in what manner they attack their prey, and I do not know how good their prey is at detecting them. I suppose that my assuming that hawks and eagles would have similar feeding habits just because they are both large birds of pretty was a little naïve, as one knows that large cats of different species have vastly disparate feeding habits. Some similarities, in short, can be misleading!

Meissen itself was like a low-rent, less-interesting version of Bautzen, just like Nordlingen was to Dinkelsbuhl. It had a castle and a cathedral, the courtyard of which was full of old relics of some import, and it had a little plaque celebrating its independence from communism in 1989, but it did not have the same vitality as Bautzen, in which I was quite happy to spend four or so hours. I left Meissen after two or three hours and went to Moritzburg, which was nothing but a castle and a huge amount of woodland - hundreds and hundreds of hectares, where the nobility much have hunted before, or at least gone horseback riding. The most interesting part of the area, besides the mosquitoes, was a nearby residence that was much smaller and appeared to be worse-kempt, as the smaller residence's showing its wear made one feel a little more that one was walking in an area of historic interest. I came back to Dresden by bus, with the help of a local who told me where the bus stop was, thinking that not every day abroad has to be a fireworks display, so to speak. While I did not have any epiphanies or revolutions in my ways of thinking, I had a reasonably-pleasant day, did a lot of walking, and got to experience one more day navigating in a foreign, German-language environment. Even on travels in countries of enormous interest, such as Italy or France, not every day is earth-shattering, I bet.

I will probably end this email soon, as I want to look some stuff up and expect to be pulled into conversation - not a bad thing, but a distraction from writing (and from leaving on time this morning) - in the near future. One difference in the cultural climates of the Czech Republic and Germany is that one wants to learn the language here and to use it as much as possible, while one has no desire to learn, speak, or understand Czech. I had a funny encounter buying strawberries today. When I had decided, having considered buying cherries, on a half-kilogram box of strawberries, I took it to the cash register and said, "I would like one strawberries, please," as I did not know the word "box." The man selling the strawberries jokingly took one out of the box and gave it to me, explaining that he had given me what I asked for, and then told me how to say "box." One's desire to expand one's linguistic landscape (for lack of a better term for one's general proficiency in a language; it is much more than just learning new words, as one needs to be able to combine them) grows with every passing day: one starts out with the most basic phrases relating to trains, food, and oneself, and then passes on to constructions that involve possession (mine, yours, &c.), one's interlocutor, and objects (e.g., talking about the landscape, someone's dog, &c.) that will not bring one any material benefit (such as food or a train ticket), after which one starts learning how to use articles and conjugate verbs so as to speak at least a little grammatically. Germans are very accepting of foreigners and are perfectly willing to speak German with people who obviously do not speak it very well, and they will very often simplify their language for our sake, though they sometimes grow overly zealous and talk to one as though one spoke German fluently. In short, this is a wonderful country to visit, and every passing day in it only increases one's enthusiasm for it. [Edit: I forgot to mention that pronunciation in German can be fiendishly hard, an even bigger roadblock to one's speaking than grammar or vocabulary. Germans almost always put their emphasis on the first syllables of words, which is, in addition to being inconvenient both for long words and when one does not know how to pronounce the rest of a word (and will, naturally, linger over the more difficult syllables, changing their emphasis), challenging because Germans, like English speakers (I included), very rarely understand words that are both mispronounced and pronounced with the emphasis on the wrong syllable. I have not yet learnt how to deal with this problem, as I am naturally going to mispronounce words given my lack of experience with the language; my patch-up solution has been to give a little pause after the first syllable to add extra emphasis to it (which must sound strange and stupid, but at least makes me understood) and to enunciate as clearly as possible. It seems, so far, to be working all right.]

My final notes are, predictably, few. Meissen was clearly poorer than Bautzen or Dresden, as it had some crumbling and terribly-decrepit buildings, but it was not nearly as bad as anything that I saw in Eastern Europe. I saw some of the same shanties, big enough for two rooms at most, next to the train tracks as I saw outside of Nuremberg; while I mentioned them, I think, in my first post about Dresden, I cannot help but mention them again, as they are shocking. What the hell are people doing living in one- or two-room shanties next to a giant, burgeoning city? Are these people who, having retired, do not have enough money to rent or buy an apartment, and so live in a cheap place with no expenses save for the food that they cannot grow in their gardens? These cannot possibly be summer homes, like many Russians have, as they are both too small and are located some ten or twenty meters from the train tracks: no one would want to live there. I cannot say that these are symptomatic of Eastern Germany's poverty or of poverty in general, as they seem to be everywhere and are probably not as squalid as they seem; their existence merely baffles me. I do not believe that Eastern Germany - or, at least the parts that I have seen - is any poorer than Western Germany. That is, if Eastern Germany is poorer than the west, it does not show. There must be many somewhat rundown cities like Meissen in Western Germany, plus Meissen was hit hard by the recent flooding. I would be curious to see if what  I see in Leipzig or Berlin will convince me that the east of the country is still trying to catch up to the west. (One could cite Dresden's widespread construction sites as evidence of its being behind, but Cologne, a presumably-wealthy city, had just as much construction.)

My reading of Gilyarovsky's "Moscow and Muscovites," and the author's descriptions of sanitation in late-19th-century Russia in particular, have made me think that there is no single metric by which to measure societal progress. Based on Gilyarovsky's descriptions, Moscow had a horribly-inefficient sewage system just over a hundred years ago, with houses in poorer districts being flooded by seepage during heavy rains (or the heat of summer - I cannot remember which). This interested me in relation to the Czech Republic's current filthiness, as Germany's being so much cleaner than the Czech Republic is one side (of many) to its being vastly more developed than the latter. Nonetheless, it is not like there is one country to which all others should aspire as to a model; there is not one correct way for a country to be or one maximal level of development to which all countries should aspire. Some countries are, clearly, more developed than others, but it seems to me that each country should aspire to be more developed than it was in the past, rather than trying to live up to the level of development of its neighbors. It is interesting that countries seem to go through similar phases of development, such as developing workable systems of sewage transport and keeping its roads and sidewalks clean; despite reaching similar milestones at different times, countries end up in very different places, so to speak.
 
The strawberries here are excellent and look slightly better than the cherries, which, while tantalizing, cannot live up to the fantastic, and exorbitantly-priced, cherries that I bought in liquor stores in Prague (Yes, it is a bizarre society.). My only other note is that Dresden takes it 6:00 PM church bells very seriously. The knelling of the bells two nights ago was almost symphonic, as it sounded like one bell held a steady, bass note, while the other bells ran out over it; one felt as though one were listening to a choir on the streets! I may visit the Hygiene Museum, which I probably mentioned two days ago, tomorrow morning before leaving for Leipzig, as it sounds unique and only costs $3 for students (Being a student is great for travelling.). It feels like just yesterday that I got here (It was two days ago.); it is still strange that I only have two more cities to visit before I fly to Amsterdam and then, after six more days (which will feel almost like a postscript, as I will be staying with family friends and will be a short train ride away from the airport), fly home. I have no regrets about leaving, as one has to end these trips eventually; I look forward to regular exercise, seeing family and friends, routines, and serious work. As long as nothing in the world (i.e., in the historical parts of cities that I want to visit or in their natural surroundings) changes drastically in the next few years, I will be able to happily wait for each 9-month period in Fayetteville for my next chance to go abroad. I will certainly have plenty of experience on which to base future decisions (e.g., I did not take any night trains this year and will avoid Eastern Europe in future) and should be able to make each coming trip more enjoyable than the last!
 
This is Meissen's picture-perfect castle hill.
 
Moritzburg Castle from across the water.
 

Tuesday 16 July 2013

Day 46 - Bautzen

I am hoping that a good way to get myself to finish the email that I starting writing yesterday will be to write today's email. I have so much to say that I do not want to start writing!
I will start this post off with a few simple observations. The one thing of which Dresden cannot boast to Prague is the number of Russians in the city; there are probably at least as many Russians per capita in Prague as there are in Dresden. Dresden is better than Prague in every other way. The train station is more efficiently-run than Prague's; the people who work at the train station are polite and give one tons of help and information; far more trains enter and leave Dresden, as far as I can tell, than do Prague; and one can get high-quality, local, relatively-cheap fruit from street vendors, of which I could not find any in Prague, rather than having to buy it for exorbitant prices at liquor stores (I hope that Prague is unique in this way; it was not one of the city's high points.). There are no more bums wandering the streets and begging for change, and there are no more gaudy advertisements on every corner. Advertising in Prague is of the type that might appeal to chimpanzees: advertisements are made as large as possible and are done up in the brightest possible colors, often with striking contrasts between their background colors and the colors of their lettering. Since they compete with one another, they stick out from builings and hang over the street like some sort of monstrous, mutant foliage. (Advertising in Russia is identical.) In both Dresden and Bautzen, signs are small and neat, attracting one by saying what they have to say without jumping up and down and screaming in one's ears, so to speak. Stores display exactly what they have to offer rather than being designed on the assumption that store owners will have pull people inside off of the streets with their signs.

That being said, I spent my day in Bautzen. I left the hostel in which I am staying at around 10:00 AM and had breakfast (very cheaply) at a bakery, at which point I had an epiphany: one can buy milk, cereal, and breadstuffs and have normal breakfasts while travelling. Up until this morning, I was averse to doing so, as I was wary of not finishing what I bought and having to lug it around Europe with me. This fear, I think, was inculcated in me by my experience of carrying everything on my back when I made my first few trips across the ocean. Now that I have an ordinary (for the modern day - i.e., with wheels) suitcase, the idea of carrying around a bit of unfinished cereal is not all that repulsive, as it does not weigh much or take up much space once one has thrown the box away (or, rather, recycled it; people recycle as much as possible in Germany). It is a pity that I did not think of buying ordinary food for breakfast until just now; since I spent only one night in several cities, which would have made buying ordinary foodstuffs impossible (as one cannot buy small enough portions of them), and since the hostels in which I previously stayed for multiple nights offered free or (somewhat) affordable breakfasts, it never occurred to me to buy my own breakfast food. I will make use of this new realization if either of the hostels in Leipzig or Berlin do not offer free breakfasts; otherwise, I will have to keep it in mind for a future trip.

Having breakfasted, I went to the cathedral, which I did not get to see yesterday. The cathedral's interior was much more spare than any that I had seen of late, and its columns - what I have been calling "supporting pillars" - were placed in such a way as to create the effect of the cathedral's having several different rooms. One of these, the most interesting, was a memorial for the Jews mistreated prior to World War II and slaughtered during the war; a plaque in the room read, "We will not forget." It will be tough to summarize my thoughts on this matter in a small amount of time and space; the basic gist of them, as stated in a previous post, is that Germany does a great job of remembering the war and openly talking about it. While it was the Germans who slaughtered so many Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, mental retards, and other so-called undesirables, the war itself, and even the Holocaust, were more of a human disaster than anything else. Prominent Nazis were tried for crimes against humanity specifically because their actions did damage to mankind as a whole: they were crimes of man against man more than Nazi against Jew; they were a disaster for the entire human race. As such, it is the duty of all people from all nations to remember the Holocaust and other such atrocities in an effort to avoid repeating them. In my last post on this subject, I sounded pessimistic about our having learned anything from the mistakes of World War II, as many large-scale atrocities - genocides - have taken place since then. A metaphor that occurred to me then, but which I did not want to use, as I feared that it would trivialize the Holocaust and put it in too positive a light, was that World War II was like a natural brush fire, which clears out a forest's dead undergrowth and makes room for the growth of new plants and trees. According to this metaphor, World War II cleared out an imperialistic, old-world order of nations' continuously trying to oust and outdo one another, making room for the growth of such institutions as the UN and the realizations that genocide is not good for us and that we would do better to work together than to try to kill each other.

My main fear about this analogy, besides the risk that it would cast World War II in a positive light (as a positive destructive force that led to the construction of better things), was that it might be grossly inaccurate: I am not sure if our suffering through World War II led to any important new understandings about world affairs, and I am not sure if the world that replaced it is any better than the world that it detroyed. I expect that it had a positive impact on Europe (though whether it was worth all of that bloodshed is questionable), as the WHO, EU, and other large-scale, global organizations may never have formed if Europe had not grown more unified (and I expect that the war made it more unified, in the end), and Germany itself, as well as all of the rest of Western Europe, to my knowledge, has abstained from large-scale murder since the end of the war. I wonder if relations between neighboring countries in Europe were so acrimonious and the desire for conquest so great that, had World War II not broken out, another, equivalent war would, at some point, have arisen and done the same basic things as World War II, perhaps leading to the massacre of some other group of people than the Jews; one can only speculate. The Jews themselves were in a unique position leading up to World War II, as they had been hated in much of Europe for hundreds of years and had no country of their own; it is possible that no other group of people was as likely as they to be prayed upon. Whatever the case, my main query is whether or not the effects of World War II, while the war itself was a calamity, included increased European (Western European) unification and the creation of large-scale organizations that have made life better for a giant number of people all over the world.

These are the types of questions that are discussed in Dresden itself, in the city's Hygeine Museum (or something like that). The museum is located just outside of the historic city center, far enough away that I probably will not find time to see it, given that my hostel is far from Dresden's main train station but right next to a different train station. My plan was to visit the Hygeine Museum after seeing Bautzen today, but I was so tired when I got back from Bautzen that I decided to head right back to my hostel. I may still see the museum tomorrow, if I have the energy; I will not have to cook, as I have made enough dinner for two nights, and I might be better-rested tomorrow. I slept fine last night, but I still have a bit of a hangover, so to speak, from Prague. My sleeping schedule is not that interesting, though, and I have strayed from the topic of this email!

My trip to Bautzen was entirely painless, which could not have been said of any of my trips through Eastern Europe. I was told exactly how to get there and back by a member of the railway staff; the train that I was in was air-conditioned and had big windows; every train stop was displayed overhead and mentioned on a loudspeaker; and the train was even on time. The countryside outside of Dresden is densely-wooded, and I saw three hawks on the way to Bautzen; I have not mentioned the birds much of late because, while I like them, I cannot name any of them, and I have nothing new to say about them. As was the case with Dinkelsbuhl, I got an excellent view of Bautzen's historic city center as the train pulled up to the platform. My walk through the city filled me with impressions, which it would be hard to arrange in any orderly way. Despite being quite small (It has a population of roughly 40,000 people.), Bautzen has modern shopping malls and a modern medical center; the city has the most sophisticated bike paths, which include a separate lane for bikers who are turning left, that I have ever seen; it has a giant number of historical monuments, each with a plaque describing (in German) what their purpose is (or was?); it has a museum, music hall, and restaurants devoted to the preservation of Sorbian culture, which is that of a Slavic (I think) people that resides in East Germany; it has a river and a huge number of trees for such a small city; it has parts of its old city wall and many of its old towers; and so on. What Canadian city, I wonder, can boast of such a rich combination of modern and historical accoutrements? My trip to Bautzen gave me the idea that, beyond simply being pleasant to visit, small towns can sometimes give one more of a proverbial window into the past than larger cities, which much more prominently display large-scale human achievement. Since life in small cities changes so slowly, and since there is so little construction and development in them (compared to that in big cities), they are better-equipped to show us what life was like, say, a hundred, or two hundred, or five hundred years ago than larger cities, which are bound to be more modern. While the juxtaposition of new and old can be rewarding and enrich a city's contemporary profile, it cannot help but water down one's impression of the past, as old cathedrals do not look so old when they are right next to shopping malls. (While Bautzen had plenty of newer buildings, they were not right next to the old ones, as the city center was too small to hold very many of them.) My gripes about wasting time in small cities in Eastern Europe was not so much founded on those cities' being small, then, but on their being in Eastern Europe: small cities in Germany (and, presumably, France, Italy, Spain, and England) can both be pleasant to visit and teach one more about the world. Bautzen restored my confidence in the value of not exclusively visiting metropolises, while my visit to Dresden itself has erased all regret that I might have felt at having spent so much time in Germany - each major city in Germany has something different to offer.

Dresden, as I may end up mentioning in yesterday's post about Dresden, which, anacronistically, I am going to finish after this one, is largely under construction. The firebombing at the end of World War II was, while fully deserved, a disaster for the city, and its oppression under communist Russia further retarded its growth into a cultural center. Beyond being full of reminders of World War II, Dresden has many statues and plaques in memorium of its difficult years under communist dictatorship and its triumphant casting off of the chains of communism. Dresdeners' pride in their past reminds me of that of Bratislava, as the city is permeated by an air of successfully overcoming difficulties and continuing to grow. The city is full of students and young parents; it has large, clean, safe, and very-elaborate playgrounds for children; it is full of cyclists and bike paths; and its people are friendly and open, as though friendliness and openness were expected: the citizens of this city are united by more than geography. I may as well end this email on this note and continue to my previous one, in which I will make more observations about the city itself; I hope to finished it quickly enough to send it today, as it would be nice not to have it carry over into tomorrow's writing time. I have a busy day planned for the morrow and will probably have enough to write about without having to finish an earlier email. Goodbye!

I have one more point to make. The river Spree is spelt Sprjewje in Polish, if my memory holds. What the hell were the Polish thinking when they made this name up?
This is a view of part of Bautzen and the river Spree.